First thing I want to discuss is a touchy subject for many. I want to look at 1.5 mile ovals. First off, before we can even think about returning to these types of tracks, which include Chicagoland, Kansas, and Las Vegas, extensive testing will need to be done to ensure that pack racing has been eliminated, which is the main concern with Indycar at these tracks. The packs form at these tracks due to the banking at the turns and length of the track. The reason behind this concern was the crash at Las Vegas in 2011 and the overall risk of a violent crash compromising the lives of others. But with races last year at Texas and Fontana that were spread out thanks to lower downforced cars, the racing was better and safer.
Other ovals that would great for Indycar include tracks at Michigan and Phoenix. Michigan ceased hosting Indycar races in 2007, and Phoenix in 2005. Both tracks would put on a great race for the fans and drivers. Phoenix is a short oval that would present a challenge to all drivers. Michigan is a huge track that closely resembles Fontana. Both would be mega additions.
|Indycar at Michigan in 2007 (Photo credit not listed)|
Some not so likely but would still love to see them tracks on the schedule include Kentucky, Nashville, Richmond, and Twin Ring Motegi. All four have hosted Indycar races in the past and would be great additions to the series next year.
And last but not least, why not Rockingham in Great Britain? I've been saying we should race there for about five decades but either people don't agree with me or they don't say anything when I bring it up. If you disagree with me, feel free to throw a brick at me.
Obviously it is irrational to want all those races on the schedule, but maybe two to three on the schedule next year to replace the second double-header races at Toronto, Detroit, and Houston to keep the schedule at 19 races would be ideal.
Let me know what you think.